Does Learning from Examples Improve Tutored Problem Solving?
نویسنده
چکیده
Theoretical Background Our research focuses particularly on the intermediate stage of skill acquisition in which the primary instructional aim is to gain understanding and to close knowledge gaps. One very successful instructional approach which tries to optimize cognitive skill acquisition is the use of Cognitive Tutors (e.g., Koedinger, Anderson, Hadley, & Mark, 1997). These computer-based tutors provide individualized support for learning by doing by selecting appropriate problems tobe-solved, by providing feedback and problem-solving hints, and by on-line assessment of the student’s learning progress. Although problem solving supported by Cognitive Tutors has been shown to be successful in fostering initial acquisition of cognitive skills, this approach does not seem to be optimal with respect to focusing the learner on the domain principles to be learned. One instructional idea to further improve the focus on principles in Cognitive Tutors can be taken from cognitive load theory research (e.g., Sweller, van Merriënboer, & Paas, 1998) or more specifically from the instructional model of example-based learning by Renkl (2005). The basic idea is to reduce problem-solving demands by providing worked-out solutions in the intermediate stage, when the primary instructional goal is to gain understanding. Thereby, more of the learners’ limited processing capacity (i.e., working memory capacity) can be devoted to understanding the domain principles and their application in problem solving, especially when worked-out examples are combined with self-explanation prompts. We expect that the effectiveness of a Cognitive Tutor unit will be further enhanced when it presents faded worked-out examples to learners in the beginning of each curricular section. When studying worked-out examples, more of the learners’ limited processing capacity can be devoted to an effort to understand solution steps in terms of the application of domain principles. Assuring that learners have a basic understanding before they start to solve problems should help them to deal with the problem-solving demands by referring to already-understood principles instead of shallow strategies. The use of principles during problem solving not only enables learners to deepen their knowledge, by successfully applying it to new problems, but will also cause them to notice gaps in their understanding of the principles when they reach an impasse. Cognitive Tutors can then help to repair the knowledge gaps.
منابع مشابه
Tutored Problem Solving vs . “ Pure ” Worked Examples
At present a handful of comparisons have been made of different variants of worked examples and tutored problem solving. There is some evidence to report a benefit of adding worked examples (WE) to current tutored problem solving (TPS) environments. Our research investigated how a “pure” WE condition could compete with a TPS condition. By pure we mean the WE condition does not include tutoring,...
متن کاملWhy Tutored Problem Solving May be Better Than Example Study: Theoretical Implications from a Simulated-Student Study
Is learning by solving problems better than learning from worked-out examples? Using a machine-learning program that learns cognitive skills from examples or by being taught, we have conducted a study to compare three learning strategies: learning by solving problems with feedback and hints from a tutor, learning by generalizing worked-out examples exhaustively, and learning by generalizing wor...
متن کاملWorked Examples and Tutored Problem Solving: Redundant or Synergistic Forms of Support?
The current research investigates a combination of two instructional approaches, tutored problem solving and worked examples. Tutored problem solving with automated tutors has proven to be an effective instructional method. Worked-out examples have been shown to be an effective complement to untutored problem solving, but it is largely unknown whether they are an effective complement to tutored...
متن کاملAdaptive Support versus Alternating Worked Examples and Tutored Problems: Which Leads to Better Learning?
Learning from worked examples has been shown to be superior to unsupported problem solving when first learning in a new domain. Several studies have found that learning from examples results in faster learning in comparison to tutored problem solving in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. We present a study that compares a fixed sequence of alternating worked examples and tutored problem solving with...
متن کاملAre worked examples and tutored problem solving synergistic forms of support?
Tutored problem solving with automated tutors has proven to be an effective instructional method. Worked-out examples have been shown to be an effective complement to untutored problem solving, but it is largely unknown whether they are an effective complement to tutored problem solving. Further, while computer-based learning environments offer the possibility of adaptively transitioning from e...
متن کاملExamples and Tutored Problems: Adaptive Support Using Assistance Scores
Research shows that for novices learning from worked examples is superior to unsupported problem solving. Additionally, several studies have shown that learning from examples results in faster learning in comparison to supported problem solving in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In a previous study, we have shown that alternating worked examples and problem solving was superior to using just one ...
متن کامل